Nomination Clarifications Post #2

[slashmarks]

If you've found a duplicate or other mistake, please let me know here! There will be a general duplicate and formatting clean up after nominations close and before sign ups open.

Nominators for the tags below have about 48 hours to fix them, defend them or replace them with something else (until 4 AM EDT on the 28th). After that, I will reject or fix them as below.

Fandoms:

Last post I received a request to separate Fire Emblem into separate games and remove the current nominations under the series tag. (Comment here). I'm not familiar with this fandom. Could any other Fire Emblem participants with feelings on this share their opinions?

Relationships:

Bottom who flags orange right/Dom who teaches them why that's a bad idea - Could the nominator explain what they mean by this?

Freeforms:

Off-topic:

The following tags will be rejected unless they are edited to incorporate BDSM/etc. explicitly.

General reminders: fantasy is not eligible unless the fantastic creatures or worldbuilding involves kink; non-con and abuse must also involve kink to be eligible. Not all sex acts are eligible as freeform tags, although you're welcome to incorporate them in your optional details.

AU - Everyone is a Mythical Creature/has Sex with Mythical Creatures
AU - Everyone is an Angel or a Demon and Being Attracted to their Opposite is Unlawful
Begging
Cock Rings
Mating Bond
Negative Attention Seeking Behavior
Scenario - Masquerade Sex with Characters pretending not to know each other's Identity
Yandere

The following tags I am open to discussion about but am currently leaning towards rejecting:

Captivity, Lima Syndrome, Stockholm Syndrome, Worldbuilding - Dragon Monster Girls imprison lover(s) in their hoard

All of these tags involve kidnapping scenarios but no further kink/sexual details. I've approved some BDSM fantasy scenarios like Sexual Slavery, but my feeling is that kidnapping by itself is more like a general non-con or assault tag, and I would prefer more specific kink/sexy details for these tags to approve them. I'm open to discussion, here!

Ambiguous Tags

The following tags need to be clarified. I will edit them as I see fit or reject if I don't receive more information.

Nonsexual Kink - Nonsexual Intimate Touch as Part of D/s Scene - could the nominator give an example or explain what they mean by this?

Nursing Kink - I assume you probably want the medical profession, but could you confirm whether you want nurse (profession) kink, or nursing (breast milk) kink?

Using a partner like they are no more than life support for a cock/dildo/hole - Could the nominator explain what they mean by this?

Comments

[lonelyaura]

"Bottom who flags orange right/Dom who teaches them why that's a bad idea"

As according to a common variation of the hanky code, orange means "anything, anywhere, anytime." Orange right means being on the receiving end of that. (It can also mean "nothing at all" because the hanky code is wonderful like that.) As its first meaning, most people that I've interacted with find it foolish/a bad idea, and one man I know actually told a young guy flagging that that they were going to go outside and he was going to castrate the other guy and feed him his balls. Not something he followed through on, obviously, but it got the point across.

So the purpose to that tag is to harken back to why saying "no limits ever" is uh, not a great idea. Up to the writer how far they take it though.

[(Anonymous)]

I love this prompt, but I think you're wanting orange left;
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/Color_Codes.jpg/900px-Color_Codes.jpg
https://closetprofessor.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/image8.jpeg?w=768&h=1368
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/06/Hanky_Codes.png
Just in case anyone doesn't see this discussion and gives the opposite!

[lonelyaura]

I'll change it anyway for clarity's sake as according to slashmarks, but the communities I've been around generally say orange right for receiving "anything!" Which isn't global, but *shrugs*

https://www.bootdog.com/hankies.html

[slashmarks]

Thank you! Yeah, I found conflicting information on what that code means, too, so I'd like to incorporate it into the freeform if possible just to make sure everyone knows what they're matching on (thematic concern, LOL). Would "Bottom Who Uses Hankie Code To Say Anything Goes/Dom Who Teaches Them That's A Bad Idea (OW)" work for you?

[lonelyaura]

Sure thing! Ty!

[slashmarks]

Thank you!