slashmarks: (Leo)
[personal profile] slashmarks posting in [community profile] bdsmexchange
If you've found a duplicate or other mistake, please let me know here! There will be a general duplicate and formatting clean up after nominations close and before sign ups open.

Nominators for the tags below have about 48 hours to fix them, defend them or replace them with something else (until 4 AM EDT on the 28th). After that, I will reject or fix them as below.

Fandoms:

Last post I received a request to separate Fire Emblem into separate games and remove the current nominations under the series tag. (Comment here). I'm not familiar with this fandom. Could any other Fire Emblem participants with feelings on this share their opinions?

Relationships:

Bottom who flags orange right/Dom who teaches them why that's a bad idea - Could the nominator explain what they mean by this?

Freeforms:

Off-topic:

The following tags will be rejected unless they are edited to incorporate BDSM/etc. explicitly.

General reminders: fantasy is not eligible unless the fantastic creatures or worldbuilding involves kink; non-con and abuse must also involve kink to be eligible. Not all sex acts are eligible as freeform tags, although you're welcome to incorporate them in your optional details.

AU - Everyone is a Mythical Creature/has Sex with Mythical Creatures
AU - Everyone is an Angel or a Demon and Being Attracted to their Opposite is Unlawful
Begging
Cock Rings
Mating Bond
Negative Attention Seeking Behavior
Scenario - Masquerade Sex with Characters pretending not to know each other's Identity
Yandere


The following tags I am open to discussion about but am currently leaning towards rejecting:

Captivity, Lima Syndrome, Stockholm Syndrome, Worldbuilding - Dragon Monster Girls imprison lover(s) in their hoard

All of these tags involve kidnapping scenarios but no further kink/sexual details. I've approved some BDSM fantasy scenarios like Sexual Slavery, but my feeling is that kidnapping by itself is more like a general non-con or assault tag, and I would prefer more specific kink/sexy details for these tags to approve them. I'm open to discussion, here!

Ambiguous Tags

The following tags need to be clarified. I will edit them as I see fit or reject if I don't receive more information.

Nonsexual Kink - Nonsexual Intimate Touch as Part of D/s Scene - could the nominator give an example or explain what they mean by this?

Nursing Kink - I assume you probably want the medical profession, but could you confirm whether you want nurse (profession) kink, or nursing (breast milk) kink?

Using a partner like they are no more than life support for a cock/dildo/hole - Could the nominator explain what they mean by this?

Date: 2022-05-26 08:27 am (UTC)
lailah_tov: A seal surrounded by stars, balancing a moon on its nose (Default)
From: [personal profile] lailah_tov
Nonsexual Kink - Nonsexual Intimate Touch as Part of D/s Scene

That one's mine. I was thinking of something like this story where the sub's reward for being good is getting a nonsexual kiss and cuddles from the domme, or nonsexual intimate touch as part of service (such as giving a massage or being a literal bedwarmer). Basically the inverse of the smut tags.

I don't see another good way to specify that I want intimate touch between the participants in a scene but explicitly don't want it to be sexual touch. I'm open to rewording if you think it's unclear or have another idea of how to express it. I could break it out into Nonsexual Kink - Dom Rewards Sub with Nonsexual Intimate Touch and Nonsexual Kink - Sub Provides Nonsexual Intimate Touch as Part of Service, but I liked the idea of it being a more general tag and letting the writer interpret it as they prefer.
Edited Date: 2022-05-26 08:29 am (UTC)

Date: 2022-05-26 08:33 am (UTC)
lailah_tov: A seal surrounded by stars, balancing a moon on its nose (Default)
From: [personal profile] lailah_tov
I'm not sure why the "only" phrasing makes it more acceptable than the current phrasing; can you explain? I don't see a reason to specify that. There might be some situations where both nonsexual and sexual touch happen in a scene, and I'd be fine with that.

Also, I would strongly prefer to retain "intimate touch" as part of the tag, not just "touch."

Date: 2022-05-26 09:25 pm (UTC)
lailah_tov: A seal surrounded by stars, balancing a moon on its nose (Default)
From: [personal profile] lailah_tov

That works!

Date: 2022-05-26 09:15 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hello! I didn't nominate any Fire Emblem games this round, but I'm a strong supporter of separating the Fire Emblem games into individual fandoms.

1. As the previous commenter mentioned, the Fire Emblem games aren't related to each other at all, aside from a few exceptions (e.g. the single tag Fire Emblem: Soen no Kiseki/Akatsuki no Megami | Fire Emblem Path of Radiance/Radiant Dawn covers 2 games, the second of which is a sequel to the first). Aside from those exceptions, the games do not share characters or settings. They're stand-alone; playing one game would enable you to offer/request that game, but not others. Several of the early entries in the franchise have never even been released in English.

2. Seperating the fandoms would make it much more feasible for creators and requesters to offer/request 'any' in the individual fandoms, whereas the general tag is most definitely too broad to even think of doing that, since it would include a large number of games in the franchise that are completely unrelated and which participants wouldn't be expected to be familiar with.

3. The umbrella tag also includes the side games such as the gacha game (Heroes) and the fighting game (Warriors), which feature alternate versions of characters from the main games. Characters being listed generally under the Fire Emblem Series would mean opening up the risky possibility of someone requesting/offering a character only knowing either the side game or main game version, and then ending up matched to someone who only knows of the other. (Especially if the canonical tag, Character (Fire Emblem) is used.)

In short: please separate the Fire Emblem games into individual fandoms!

Date: 2022-05-26 09:46 am (UTC)
lonelyaura: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lonelyaura
"Bottom who flags orange right/Dom who teaches them why that's a bad idea"

As according to a common variation of the hanky code, orange means "anything, anywhere, anytime." Orange right means being on the receiving end of that. (It can also mean "nothing at all" because the hanky code is wonderful like that.) As its first meaning, most people that I've interacted with find it foolish/a bad idea, and one man I know actually told a young guy flagging that that they were going to go outside and he was going to castrate the other guy and feed him his balls. Not something he followed through on, obviously, but it got the point across.

So the purpose to that tag is to harken back to why saying "no limits ever" is uh, not a great idea. Up to the writer how far they take it though.

Date: 2022-05-26 11:43 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I love this prompt, but I think you're wanting orange left;
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/Color_Codes.jpg/900px-Color_Codes.jpg
https://closetprofessor.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/image8.jpeg?w=768&h=1368
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/06/Hanky_Codes.png
Just in case anyone doesn't see this discussion and gives the opposite!

Date: 2022-05-26 07:29 pm (UTC)
lonelyaura: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lonelyaura
I'll change it anyway for clarity's sake as according to slashmarks, but the communities I've been around generally say orange right for receiving "anything!" Which isn't global, but *shrugs*

https://www.bootdog.com/hankies.html

Date: 2022-05-26 07:29 pm (UTC)
lonelyaura: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lonelyaura
Sure thing! Ty!

Date: 2022-05-26 08:27 pm (UTC)
smallredb0y: (Default)
From: [personal profile] smallredb0y
Hey, I nominated Nursing Kink -- I actually did mean breast milk and not the profession. Whatever you think works best for disambiguation works for me, admin :)

Date: 2022-05-27 02:03 am (UTC)
setenaya: a hand wearing artificial claws (claws)
From: [personal profile] setenaya
Typo in 여주인공의 오빠를 지키는 방법 - 킨 | The Way to Protect the Female Lead's Older Brother - Kin:

Roxanna Agriche tops Dion Agriche (TWTPTFLOB)

Should be "Roxana".
sirvalkyrie: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sirvalkyrie
This is mine. Dragons are known for keeping what they deem as precious in a hoard. This is an extension of that. They view their lover as precious and so are confining them to their hoard. The dragon is showing domination and restricting the ability to go places. I wanted to keep it a bit broad so that the creator could use a variety of means to keep the lover there whether it is something like honor bondage, restraints, etc.

What phrasing would make this acceptable to you?
sirvalkyrie: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sirvalkyrie
I actually hadn't thought of the kidnapping interpretation at all.

I saw it as something that all or most dragon monster girls would do or want to do with their lovers but the exact details would depend on the personality of the dragon monster girl. Like one that is a better person would be doing it consensually with their lover like using honor bondage or CNC while an evil dragon monster girl might stick her lover in bondage gear and shackle them to the wall regardless of what they wanted.

I guess the gist of it was that I wanted to combine Dragon Monster Girls + Dragon tendency to hoard precious things + BDSM, if that makes sense?
sirvalkyrie: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sirvalkyrie
I had earlier changed it to "Worldbuilding - Dragon Monster Girls want to be Doms and make their lover(s) part of their hoard".

Duplicates

Date: 2022-05-28 04:44 am (UTC)
sarriathmg: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sarriathmg
Spotted a couple of duplicated tags:

Under "Arcane: League of Legends (Cartoon 2021)" in cartoons:

Jinks tops Caitlyn (ALOL)
and
Jinx tops Caitlyn (Arcane: LoL)

(Jinx is the correct spelling)

And under additional tags:

A/B/O - Omega Wets Themself to Show Submission
and
A/B/O - Omega Wetting Self As Ultimate Sign Of Submission

They should mean roughly the same thing. I'm the one who submitted the first one and personally I feel like adding "ultimate" or not doesn't make enough difference to warrant the tags being separate.

Date: 2022-05-29 07:38 am (UTC)
hobbitdragon: (Default)
From: [personal profile] hobbitdragon
I nominated "Using a partner like they are no more than life support for a cock/dildo/hole". I clarified it to say "Objectification - Using a partner like they are no more than life support for a cock/dildo/hole". Does that provide enough clarification? Let me know if not.

Date: 2022-05-29 07:58 pm (UTC)
hobbitdragon: (Default)
From: [personal profile] hobbitdragon
I'm trying to communicate that the dom is, at least within the context of the scene, viewing their partner's entire body/self as no more than something to move around their dick/dildo/hole of choice. Does that make sense? I'm clearly not sure how to communicate that concept succinctly XD

Date: 2022-05-29 09:49 pm (UTC)
hobbitdragon: (Default)
From: [personal profile] hobbitdragon
I'm not talking about cockwarming or muffwarming, tho, or immobolization. I'm talking more about the mental/emotional state or interpersonal dynamic? I'm not sure how to communicate that more clearly than I have though. Hmm. I guess it's something like seeing the sub (at least in the context of the scene) as only useful for their genitals or ability to weild a strap-on? Sorry if this isn't making sense.

Profile

BDSM Exchange

August 2023

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5
67891011 12
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 2nd, 2025 02:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios